TTArtisan APS-C 35mm F1.4 APS-C X 35mm
TTArtisan
56 Overall Score
vs
Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm
Viltrox
72 Overall Score
Scores
Macro
Portrait
Street
Budget
Video Cinema
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Landscape
Specifications
| TTArtisan APS-C 35mm F1.4 APS-C X 35mm | Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | — |
| Focal Length Min | 35 mm | 40 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 40 mm |
| Elements | 7 | 10 |
| Groups | 6 | 6 |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/1.4 | f/2.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.4 | — |
| Constant | ✓★ | — |
| Diaphragm Blades | 10★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Nikon Z |
| Format | APS-C★ | — |
| Weight | 0.31 kg★ | 0.40 kg |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 280 mm | 40 mm★ |
Pros & Cons
TTArtisan APS-C 35mm F1.4 APS-C X 35mm
- Strong bokeh (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong aperture (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong macro (75th percentile)
- Below average optical (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm
- Strong macro (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong aperture (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong bokeh (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
TTArtisan APS-C 35mm F1.4 APS-C X 35mm0.872score per dollar
vs
Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm0.430score per dollar
TTArtisan APS-C 35mm F1.4 APS-C X 35mm offers 2.0x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm
Scores 72 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 1 of 15 specs.
