Tokina ATXAF635DXN-03

Tokina ATXAF635DXN-03

Tokina
34 Overall Score
vs
Nikon Nikkor 2166 55-200mm

Nikon Nikkor 2166 55-200mm

Nikon
85 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Tokina
41
Nikon
84
Macro
Tokina
35
Nikon
82
Portrait
Tokina
33
Nikon
73
Street
Tokina
35
Nikon
73
Travel
Tokina
36
Nikon
72
Landscape
Tokina
44
Nikon
69
Video Cinema
Tokina
31
Nikon
69
Professional
Tokina
34
Nikon
66
Wildlife Sports
Tokina
34
Nikon
65

Specifications

Tokina ATXAF635DXN-03Nikon Nikkor 2166 55-200mm
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto
Focal Length Min16 mm55 mm
Focal Length Max135 mm200 mm
Elements1513
Groups99
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements22
CoatingBonded Multi-CoatingSuper Integrated Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/4
Min Aperture3.5-5.64-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountNikon FNikon F
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weight1.61 kg0.34 kg
Filter Thread52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAuto-focusSilent Wave Motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance500 mm200 mm
Max Magnification0.18x1:3.5

Pros & Cons

Tokina ATXAF635DXN-03

  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average build (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Nikon Nikkor 2166 55-200mm

  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong versatility (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong macro (84th percentile)84th %ile

Pricing

Nikon Nikkor 2166 55-200mm is $223 cheaper (2.9x less).

Tokina ATXAF635DXN-030.099score per dollar
vs
Nikon Nikkor 2166 55-200mm0.711score per dollar

Nikon Nikkor 2166 55-200mm offers 7.2x better value for money

Tokina ATXAF635DXN-03

Verdict

Winner: Nikon Nikkor 2166 55-200mm

Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Nikon Nikkor 2166 55-200mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider