Tokina ATXAF635DXN-03

Tokina ATXAF635DXN-03

Tokina
34 Overall Score
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic
88 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Tokina
35
Panasonic
95
Travel
Tokina
36
Panasonic
91
Landscape
Tokina
44
Panasonic
91
Budget
Tokina
41
Panasonic
90
Video Cinema
Tokina
31
Panasonic
86
Professional
Tokina
34
Panasonic
85
Portrait
Tokina
33
Panasonic
82
Street
Tokina
35
Panasonic
82
Wildlife Sports
Tokina
34
Panasonic
82

Specifications

Tokina ATXAF635DXN-03Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max135 mm200 mm
Elements1517
Groups913
Aspherical Elements31
ED Elements24
CoatingBonded Multi-CoatingFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/4
Min Aperture3.5-5.64-7.1
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon FL-Mount
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight1.61 kg0.41 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAuto-focusAutofocus
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops6.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance500 mm140 mm
Max Magnification0.18x0.5x

Pros & Cons

Tokina ATXAF635DXN-03

  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average build (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (79th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Pricing

Tokina ATXAF635DXN-03 is $455 cheaper (2.3x less).

Verdict

Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider