Sony SEL1655G_EDI_1

Sony SEL1655G_EDI_1

Sony
77 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm

Tamron
97 Overall Score

Scores

Video Cinema
Sony
82
Tamron
98
Budget
Sony
74
Tamron
96
Macro
Sony
90
Tamron
95
Professional
Sony
86
Tamron
92
Travel
Sony
69
Tamron
87
Portrait
Sony
78
Tamron
85
Landscape
Sony
69
Tamron
84
Street
Sony
73
Tamron
79
Wildlife Sports
Sony
76
Tamron
75

Specifications

Sony SEL1655G_EDI_1Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max55 mm70 mm
Elements916
Groups—12
Aspherical Elements4★3
ED Elements3★2
CoatingNano AR coatingFluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades—9★
Build
MountSony ESony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.91 kg0.54 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeXD Linear Motor★RXD
Stabilization✓✓
Focus
Min Focus Distance55 mm★190 mm
Max Magnification—1:4.8★

Pros & Cons

Sony SEL1655G_EDI_1

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong macro (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong versatility (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm

  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong versatility (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile

Pricing

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm is $1,099 cheaper (2.8x less).

Sony SEL1655G_EDI_10.045score per dollar
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm0.162score per dollar

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm offers 3.6x better value for money

Sony SEL1655G_EDI_1

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm

Scores 97 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 70mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo Cinema

Also Consider