Sigma 207975

Sigma 207975

Sigma
85 Overall Score
vs
Tamron AF020N700 28-300mm

Tamron AF020N700 28-300mm

Tamron
55 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Sigma
86
Tamron
43
Street
Sigma
86
Tamron
46
Macro
Sigma
82
Tamron
76
Portrait
Sigma
81
Tamron
52
Travel
Sigma
80
Tamron
50
Budget
Sigma
75
Tamron
63
Video Cinema
Sigma
74
Tamron
47
Landscape
Sigma
71
Tamron
49
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
66
Tamron
46

Specifications

Sigma 207975Tamron AF020N700 28-300mm
Optics
Typewide-angle-zoommacro
Focal Length Min10 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max18 mm300 mm
Elements13
Groups10
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements4
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingXR Di VC
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/6.3
Min Aperturef/2.83.5-6.3
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountSony ENikon F
FormatAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.26 kg0.54 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusBuilt in Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance117 mm67 mm
Max Magnification1:4

Pros & Cons

Sigma 207975

  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

Tamron AF020N700 28-300mm

  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong macro (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average build (24th percentile)

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Sigma 2079750.158score per dollar
vs
Tamron AF020N700 28-300mm0.092score per dollar

Sigma 207975 offers 1.7x better value for money

Verdict

Winner: Sigma 207975

Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Sigma 207975 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider