Canon L EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM
Canon
75 Overall Score
vs
TTArtisan APS-C 35mm F1.4 APS-C X 35mm
TTArtisan
56 Overall Score
Scores
Landscape
Budget
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Travel
Macro
Street
Portrait
Specifications
| Canon L EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM | TTArtisan APS-C 35mm F1.4 APS-C X 35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 24 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 105 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | 18 | 7 |
| Groups | 14 | 6 |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | — |
| ED Elements | 1★ | — |
| Coating | Super Spectra Coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/1.4 |
| Min Aperture | f/4 | f/1.4 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 10★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | Fujifilm X |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.70 kg | 0.31 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Nano USM★ | manual focus |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 5 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 450 mm | 280 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.24x★ | — |
Pros & Cons
Canon L EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong versatility (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)
TTArtisan APS-C 35mm F1.4 APS-C X 35mm
- Strong bokeh (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong aperture (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong macro (75th percentile)
- Below average optical (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
Canon L EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM0.164score per dollar
vs
TTArtisan APS-C 35mm F1.4 APS-C X 35mm0.872score per dollar
TTArtisan APS-C 35mm F1.4 APS-C X 35mm offers 5.3x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Canon L EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM
Scores 75 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.
