Thypoch Simera-C 16-75mm
Thypoch
61 Overall Score
vs
Zeiss ZM 1407-218-L 50mm
Zeiss
48 Overall Score
Scores
Portrait
Video Cinema
Budget
Travel
Street
Professional
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Macro
Specifications
| Thypoch Simera-C 16-75mm | Zeiss ZM 1407-218-L 50mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | standard | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 50 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 75 mm | 50 mm |
| Elements | — | 6 |
| Groups | — | 4 |
| Coating | — | T* |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/1.5 | f/1.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.5 | f/1.5 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 16★ | 10 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Leica M |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.45 kg | 0.25 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 46 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 900 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.0520833333★ |
Pros & Cons
Thypoch Simera-C 16-75mm
- Strong bokeh (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong versatility (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong stabilization (79th percentile)
- Below average macro (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average af (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average optical (18th percentile)18th %ile
Zeiss ZM 1407-218-L 50mm
- Strong bokeh (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong aperture (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong build (79th percentile)
- Below average af (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average optical (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average macro (24th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Pricing
Thypoch Simera-C 16-75mm0.087score per dollar
vs
Zeiss ZM 1407-218-L 50mm0.042score per dollar
Thypoch Simera-C 16-75mm offers 2.1x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Thypoch Simera-C 16-75mm
Scores 61 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 19 specs.
