Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Viltrox
69 Overall Score
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic
87 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

85 out of 100 high confidence 95 reviews

The Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.7 lens is widely loved for its sharp image quality, fast aperture, and surprisingly low price. Users praise its lightweight design, compact size, and quick autofocus, making it an excellent everyday walk-around lens. Some note autofocus can be noisier or slower than premium lenses, and a few report chromatic aberration in high-contrast scenes. A handful of complaints involve inconsistent packaging or compatibility misunderstandings, but the overall sentiment is overwhelmingly positive.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality wide open
  • Fast f/1.7 aperture for low light
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Great value for the price
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
Cons
  • Autofocus noise in quiet environments
  • Chromatic aberration in high contrast
  • No weather sealing
  • Slow autofocus in low light
  • Missing aperture ring
👍 Image quality 45
👍 Value for money 35
👍 Build quality 30
🤔 Autofocus performance 28
👍 Bokeh 15
👍 Low light performance 18

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

75 out of 100 medium confidence 10 reviews

The Panasonic Lumix S 28-200mm f/4-7.1 MACRO O.I.S. lens is widely praised for its compact size, versatile zoom range, and macro capability, making it an ideal travel companion. Users appreciate the optical stabilization and the convenience of not swapping lenses, though some note softness at extreme ends and a slow aperture. Overall, it's a solid all-in-one solution for outdoor and travel photography.

Pros
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Versatile zoom range (28-200mm)
  • Macro capability
  • Effective optical stabilization
  • Convenient all-in-one travel lens
Cons
  • Soft at wide and telephoto ends
  • Slow maximum aperture (f/4-7.1)
  • Not ideal for low light without stabilization
  • Requires stopping down for sharpness
👍 Compactness 5
👍 Versatility 4
🤔 Image quality 4
👎 Aperture speed 4
👍 Stabilization 3
👍 Macro capability 2

Scores

Macro
Viltrox
64
Panasonic
96
Budget
Viltrox
66
Panasonic
91
Landscape
Viltrox
56
Panasonic
90
Travel
Viltrox
56
Panasonic
87
Video Cinema
Viltrox
60
Panasonic
86
Portrait
Viltrox
60
Panasonic
81
Professional
Viltrox
53
Panasonic
80
Street
Viltrox
70
Panasonic
79
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
58
Panasonic
77

Specifications

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mmPanasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm200 mm
Elements1117
Groups913
Aspherical Elements11
ED Elements14★
Coatingnano multi-layer coatingFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/4
Min Aperturef/1.74-7.1
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountFujifilm XL-Mount
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✗✓★
Weight0.17 kg★0.41 kg
Filter Thread52 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★Autofocus
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—6.5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance330 mm140 mm★
Max Magnification1:7.7★0.5x

Pros & Cons

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

  • Strong build (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong macro (67th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (35th percentile)

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Pricing

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm is $655 cheaper (5.6x less).

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm0.484score per dollar
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm0.109score per dollar

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm offers 4.4x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Scores 87 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider