Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Viltrox
69 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD

Tamron Di III 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD

Tamron
57 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

85 out of 100 high confidence 95 reviews

The Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.7 lens is widely loved for its sharp image quality, fast aperture, and surprisingly low price. Users praise its lightweight design, compact size, and quick autofocus, making it an excellent everyday walk-around lens. Some note autofocus can be noisier or slower than premium lenses, and a few report chromatic aberration in high-contrast scenes. A handful of complaints involve inconsistent packaging or compatibility misunderstandings, but the overall sentiment is overwhelmingly positive.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality wide open
  • Fast f/1.7 aperture for low light
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Great value for the price
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
Cons
  • Autofocus noise in quiet environments
  • Chromatic aberration in high contrast
  • No weather sealing
  • Slow autofocus in low light
  • Missing aperture ring
👍 Image quality 45
👍 Value for money 35
👍 Build quality 30
🤔 Autofocus performance 28
👍 Bokeh 15
👍 Low light performance 18

Tamron Di III 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD

78 out of 100 medium confidence 12 reviews

This Tamron 70-300mm lens is widely praised for its excellent value, delivering solid telephoto and macro performance at a budget-friendly price. Many users highlight sharp images at mid-range and macro distances, though some note softness at the long end and noticeable chromatic aberration in high-contrast scenes. Build quality feels good for the price, with a smooth zoom action and metal mount, but a few reviewers experienced focus inconsistency and a slight catch in the zoom ring. Overall, it's a highly recommended budget telephoto for those who can work around its limitations.

Pros
  • Excellent value for money
  • Good macro performance (1:2)
  • Solid build quality for price
  • Sharp images at mid-range and macro
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
Cons
  • Soft focus at 300mm end
  • Noticeable chromatic aberration
  • Zoom ring catch around 180-200mm
  • Inconsistent autofocus on some bodies
  • Not as sharp as premium lenses
👍 Value for money 8
🤔 Image quality 10
👍 Macro performance 5
👍 Build quality 6
🤔 Autofocus performance 4
👎 Chromatic aberration 3

Scores

Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
58
Tamron
72
Landscape
Viltrox
56
Tamron
70
Street
Viltrox
70
Tamron
51
Budget
Viltrox
66
Tamron
64
Travel
Viltrox
56
Tamron
64
Macro
Viltrox
64
Tamron
62
Portrait
Viltrox
60
Tamron
40
Video Cinema
Viltrox
60
Tamron
53
Professional
Viltrox
53
Tamron
57

Specifications

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mmTamron Di III 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD
Optics
Typeprimetelephoto
Focal Length Min35 mm70 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm300 mm
Elements1115
Groups910
Aspherical Elements1★—
ED Elements11
Coatingnano multi-layer coatingBBAR (Broad-Band Anti-Reflection) Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/22
Min Aperturef/1.74.5-6.3
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades9★7
Build
MountFujifilm XNikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✗✓★
Weight0.17 kg★0.54 kg
Filter Thread52 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★RXD stepping motor
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance330 mm★800 mm
Max Magnification1:7.7★—

Pros & Cons

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

  • Strong build (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong macro (67th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (35th percentile)

Tamron Di III 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD

  • Strong versatility (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong optical (71st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Pricing

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm is $356 cheaper (3.5x less).

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm0.484score per dollar
vs
Tamron Di III 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD0.113score per dollar

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm offers 4.3x better value for money

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Tamron Di III 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD

Verdict

★ Winner: Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Scores 69 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetPortraitVideo Cinema

Tamron Di III 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD Better at:

TravelLandscapeProfessionalWildlife Sports

Also Consider