Sirui Venus E35 35mm

Sirui Venus E35 35mm

Sirui
28 Overall Score
vs
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
90 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Sirui
25
Sony
100
Street
Sirui
15
Sony
89
Travel
Sirui
10
Sony
85
Wildlife Sports
Sirui
7
Sony
84
Portrait
Sirui
22
Sony
83
Video Cinema
Sirui
15
Sony
83
Professional
Sirui
11
Sony
73
Landscape
Sirui
11
Sony
73
Macro
Sirui
47
Sony
69

Specifications

Sirui Venus E35 35mmSony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm135 mm
Elements—16
Groups—12
Aspherical Elements—1★
ED Elements—2★
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/3.5
Min Aperturef/2.93.5-5.6
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades—7★
Build
MountSony ESony E
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weight1.36 kg0.33 kg★
Filter Thread—55 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyLinear motor★
Stabilization—✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance35 mm★450 mm
Max Magnification—0.29x★

Pros & Cons

Sirui Venus E35 35mm

  • Strong macro (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Below average build (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (28th percentile)

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Pricing

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS is $213 cheaper (1.3x less).

Sirui Venus E35 35mm0.027score per dollar
vs
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.112score per dollar

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS offers 4.1x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 19 specs.

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider