Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Canon
80 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II 35mm

Sigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II 35mm

Sigma
60 Overall Score

Scores

Landscape
Canon
89
Sigma
63
Professional
Canon
80
Sigma
67
Budget
Canon
80
Sigma
51
Wildlife Sports
Canon
79
Sigma
51
Video Cinema
Canon
75
Sigma
54
Travel
Canon
73
Sigma
44
Macro
Canon
65
Sigma
69
Street
Canon
64
Sigma
53
Portrait
Canon
54
Sigma
54

Specifications

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USMSigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min15 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm35 mm
Elements1617
Groups1213
Aspherical Elements34
ED Elements21
CoatingAir-Sphere coating, Fluorine coatingWater- & Oil-Repellent Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.2
Constant
Diaphragm Blades911
Build
MountCanon RFL-Mount
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.84 kg0.76 kg
Filter Thread82 mm72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeNano USMHLA-Driven High-Speed AF Motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm280 mm
Max Magnification0.21x1:5.3

Pros & Cons

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

  • Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Sigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II 35mm

  • Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong macro (75th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Sigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II 35mm is $446 cheaper (1.3x less).

Verdict

Winner: Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Scores 80 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Sigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II 35mm Better at:

Macro

Also Consider