Carl Zeiss 000000-2096-517
Carl Zeiss
35 Overall Score
vs
Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm
Panasonic
72 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Travel
Landscape
Macro
Specifications
| Carl Zeiss 000000-2096-517 | Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 18 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 18 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | — | 12 |
| Groups | — | 9 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 1★ |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | — | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/4 |
| Constant | — | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | L-Mount |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.72 kg | 0.50 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | double-magnet linear motor★ |
| Stabilization | — | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 250 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.23x★ |
Pros & Cons
Carl Zeiss 000000-2096-517
- Strong aperture (70th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (68th percentile)
- Below average macro (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average build (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average optical (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong bokeh (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong versatility (75th percentile)
- Strong build (70th percentile)
Pricing
Carl Zeiss 000000-2096-5170.030score per dollar
vs
Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm0.055score per dollar
Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm offers 1.8x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm
Scores 72 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 20 specs.
