Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon
86 Overall Score
vs
Nikon 2197

Nikon 2197

Nikon
43 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Canon
91
Nikon
15
Video Cinema
Canon
82
Nikon
37
Budget
Canon
79
Nikon
58
Landscape
Canon
79
Nikon
30
Travel
Canon
78
Nikon
36
Professional
Canon
77
Nikon
30
Wildlife Sports
Canon
75
Nikon
33
Street
Canon
66
Nikon
42
Portrait
Canon
49
Nikon
50

Specifications

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STMNikon 2197
Optics
Typezoom—
Focal Length Min28 mm55 mm
Focal Length Max70 mm300 mm
Elements15—
Groups12—
Aspherical Elements2★—
ED Elements2★—
CoatingSuper Spectra Coating (SSC)—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22—
Min Aperturef/2.8f/4.5-5.6
Constant✓★—
Diaphragm Blades9★—
Build
MountCanon RF—
Formatfull-frame★—
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.49 kg★0.58 kg
Filter Thread67 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★—
Stabilization✓★—
Stabilization Stops5.5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance239 mm★—
Max Magnification1:4.2★—

Pros & Cons

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)

Nikon 2197

  • Strong versatility (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong aperture (66th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average build (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile

Pricing

Nikon 2197 is $682 cheaper (2.7x less).

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM0.079score per dollar
vs
Nikon 21970.104score per dollar

Nikon 2197 offers 1.3x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Scores 86 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 12 of 22 specs.

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider