Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Canon
86 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di A037 17-35mm

Tamron Di A037 17-35mm

Tamron
60 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

82 out of 100 high confidence 331 reviews

The Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM lens is widely praised for its excellent sharpness, fast and silent autofocus, and lightweight design, making it a fantastic value for amateur photographers and wildlife enthusiasts. Many users highlight the impressive image quality at the long end and the effective image stabilization, though some note softness beyond 200mm and noticeable vignetting at full zoom. A few reviewers experienced quality control issues like blurry images or a non-functional focus ring, but the overwhelming consensus is that this lens delivers outstanding performance for its price point.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness for the price
  • Fast and silent STM autofocus
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Effective image stabilization
  • Great value for money
Cons
  • Softness beyond 200mm
  • Noticeable vignetting at full zoom
  • Plastic build quality
  • Electronic manual focus requires camera power
  • Slow maximum aperture (f/5.6 at 250mm)
👍 Image quality 45
👍 Autofocus performance 30
👍 Value for money 35
🤔 Build quality 20
👍 Image stabilization 18
🤔 Sharpness at long end 25

Tamron Di A037 17-35mm

78 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

The Tamron 17-35mm f/2.8-4 lens is praised for its sharpness, good build quality, and excellent value compared to pricier Canon alternatives. Users highlight its lightweight design and suitability for landscape, architectural, and real estate photography. However, some note issues like lack of vibration control, a loose manual focus ring, and occasional camera crashes with certain bodies. Overall, it's a solid budget-friendly ultrawide zoom with minor drawbacks.

Pros
  • Sharp corner to corner
  • Excellent value for money
  • Lightweight and portable
  • Good build quality
  • Fast and quiet autofocus
Cons
  • No vibration control
  • Loose manual focus ring
  • Occasional camera crashes with some bodies
  • Less vibrant color than primes
  • Zoom ring can be stiff
👍 Sharpness 5
👍 Value for money 4
👍 Build quality 3
👍 Weight and portability 3
👍 Autofocus performance 3
👎 Vibration control 2

Scores

Budget
Canon
90
Tamron
58
Travel
Canon
85
Tamron
60
Street
Canon
81
Tamron
57
Portrait
Canon
80
Tamron
62
Wildlife Sports
Canon
78
Tamron
55
Video Cinema
Canon
76
Tamron
53
Landscape
Canon
74
Tamron
55
Professional
Canon
68
Tamron
55
Macro
Canon
62
Tamron
61

Specifications

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STMTamron Di A037 17-35mm
Optics
Typezoomwide-angle
Focal Length Min55 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max250 mm35 mm
Elements15—
Groups12—
Aspherical Elements0★—
ED Elements1★—
CoatingSuper Spectra coatingfluorine compound
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/4
Min Aperture4-5.62.8-4
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades7★—
Build
MountCanon EF-SCanon EF
FormatAPS-C★—
Weather Sealed✗✓★
Weight0.38 kg★0.46 kg
Filter Thread58 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★OSD
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance850 mm280 mm★
Max Magnification0.29x★—

Pros & Cons

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong versatility (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average macro (31st percentile)

Tamron Di A037 17-35mm

  • Strong stabilization (79th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (74th percentile)
  • Strong macro (72nd percentile)
  • Strong aperture (71st percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (32nd percentile)

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM0.435score per dollar
vs
Tamron Di A037 17-35mm0.274score per dollar

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM offers 1.6x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Scores 86 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider