Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Canon
84 Overall Score
vs
Yongnuo YN 35mm f/2 35mm

Yongnuo YN 35mm f/2 35mm

Yongnuo
45 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

82 out of 100 high confidence 331 reviews

The Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM lens is widely praised for its excellent sharpness, fast and silent autofocus, and lightweight design, making it a fantastic value for amateur photographers and wildlife enthusiasts. Many users highlight the impressive image quality at the long end and the effective image stabilization, though some note softness beyond 200mm and noticeable vignetting at full zoom. A few reviewers experienced quality control issues like blurry images or a non-functional focus ring, but the overwhelming consensus is that this lens delivers outstanding performance for its price point.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness for the price
  • Fast and silent STM autofocus
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Effective image stabilization
  • Great value for money
Cons
  • Softness beyond 200mm
  • Noticeable vignetting at full zoom
  • Plastic build quality
  • Electronic manual focus requires camera power
  • Slow maximum aperture (f/5.6 at 250mm)
👍 Image quality 45
👍 Autofocus performance 30
👍 Value for money 35
🤔 Build quality 20
👍 Image stabilization 18
🤔 Sharpness at long end 25

Yongnuo YN 35mm f/2 35mm

72 out of 100 high confidence 39 reviews

The Yongnuo 35mm f/2 EF lens is widely praised for its incredible value and decent image quality, especially for the price. Many users find it a great budget option for photography and filmmaking, though some report autofocus issues and a cheap build quality. Overall, it's a solid choice for those on a tight budget who don't need professional-grade performance.

Pros
  • Incredible value for money
  • Decent image quality
  • Lightweight and portable
  • Great for budget filmmaking
  • Good for small spaces
Cons
  • Autofocus issues
  • Cheap build quality
  • Not very sharp
  • Potential aperture failure
  • Slow autofocus in low light
👍 Value for money 8
👍 Image quality 7
👎 Autofocus performance 5
👎 Build quality 4
🤔 Low light performance 3
🤔 Sharpness 3

Scores

Budget
Canon
93
Yongnuo
47
Travel
Canon
81
Yongnuo
44
Portrait
Canon
80
Yongnuo
30
Street
Canon
80
Yongnuo
45
Wildlife Sports
Canon
78
Yongnuo
35
Video Cinema
Canon
77
Yongnuo
33
Landscape
Canon
70
Yongnuo
39
Professional
Canon
67
Yongnuo
33
Macro
Canon
61
Yongnuo
52

Specifications

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STMYongnuo YN 35mm f/2 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min55 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max250 mm35 mm
Elements157
Groups125
Aspherical Elements0★—
ED Elements1★—
CoatingSuper Spectra coatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/22
Min Aperture4-5.6f/2
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountCanon EF-SNikon F
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✗✗
Weight0.38 kg0.15 kg★
Filter Thread58 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★Autofocus
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance850 mm250 mm★
Max Magnification0.29x1:4.35★

Pros & Cons

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average macro (33rd percentile)

Yongnuo YN 35mm f/2 35mm

  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong macro (78th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (74th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Yongnuo YN 35mm f/2 35mm is $92 cheaper (1.9x less).

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Scores 84 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider