Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Overall Score
vs
Sony E SAL16F28 16mm
Sony
31 Overall Score
Scores
Portrait
Macro
Budget
Video Cinema
Street
Professional
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Specifications
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Sony E SAL16F28 16mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | wide-angle |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 16 mm |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/28 |
| Constant | ✓★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Sony A |
| Weight | — | 0.40 kg★ |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 16 mm★ |
Pros & Cons
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Sony E SAL16F28 16mm
- Strong macro (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong social proof (77th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average aperture (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
Pricing
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.064score per dollar
vs
Sony E SAL16F28 16mm0.157score per dollar
Sony E SAL16F28 16mm offers 2.5x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 44 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 1 of 9 specs.
