Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III AFA069S700 50-300mm
Tamron
86 Overall Score
Scores
Macro
Landscape
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Travel
Portrait
Street
Video Cinema
Specifications
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Tamron Di III AFA069S700 50-300mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 50 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 300 mm |
| Elements | — | 19 |
| Groups | — | 14 |
| ED Elements | — | 4★ |
| Coating | — | Fluorine Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/4.5 |
| Min Aperture | — | 4.5-6.3 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Sony E |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 0.67 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | VXD |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 220 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:2★ |
Pros & Cons
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Tamron Di III AFA069S700 50-300mm
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong macro (81st percentile)81st %ile
Pricing
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.064score per dollar
vs
Tamron Di III AFA069S700 50-300mm0.123score per dollar
Tamron Di III AFA069S700 50-300mm offers 1.9x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Tamron Di III AFA069S700 50-300mm
Scores 86 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 20 specs.
