Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Overall Score
vs
Hasselblad XCD 20-35mm f/3.2-4.5 E 20-35mm
Hasselblad
32 Overall Score
Scores
Portrait
Budget
Video Cinema
Street
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Travel
Macro
Specifications
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Hasselblad XCD 20-35mm f/3.2-4.5 E 20-35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 20 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | — | 16 |
| Groups | — | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 4★ |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/32 |
| Min Aperture | — | 3.2-4.5 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Hasselblad X |
| Format | — | medium-format |
| Weight | — | 0.81 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | stepping motor★ |
| Stabilization | — | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 320 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.09 to 0.16x★ |
Pros & Cons
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Hasselblad XCD 20-35mm f/3.2-4.5 E 20-35mm
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong versatility (68th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average social proof (25th percentile)
- Below average build (26th percentile)
Pricing
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.064score per dollar
vs
Hasselblad XCD 20-35mm f/3.2-4.5 E 20-35mm0.005score per dollar
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS offers 12.8x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 44 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 1 of 18 specs.
