Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Overall Score
vs
Leica Bundle Summilux-M 35mm f/1.4 ASPH. 35mm
Leica
31 Overall Score
Scores
Portrait
Budget
Video Cinema
Street
Professional
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Macro
Specifications
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Leica Bundle Summilux-M 35mm f/1.4 ASPH. 35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | wide-angle |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 35 mm |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/1.4 |
| Constant | ✓★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Leica M-Mount |
Pros & Cons
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Leica Bundle Summilux-M 35mm f/1.4 ASPH. 35mm
- Strong aperture (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong bokeh (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Pricing
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.064score per dollar
vs
Leica Bundle Summilux-M 35mm f/1.4 ASPH. 35mm0.004score per dollar
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS offers 16.0x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 44 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 1 of 6 specs.
