Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
43 Overall Score
vs
Sirui Aurora 35mm f/1.4 35mm
Sirui
43 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Macro
Budget
Video Cinema
Portrait
Landscape
Street
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Sirui Aurora 35mm f/1.4 35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | — | 16 |
| Groups | — | 11 |
| Coating | — | Protective Fluorine Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/16 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/1.4 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 13★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Sony E |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 0.49 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 62 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | — | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 351 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:7.14★ |
Pros & Cons
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (32nd percentile)
Sirui Aurora 35mm f/1.4 35mm
- Strong optical (73rd percentile)
- Strong build (72nd percentile)
- Strong macro (66th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.062score per dollar
vs
Sirui Aurora 35mm f/1.4 35mm0.078score per dollar
Sirui Aurora 35mm f/1.4 35mm offers 1.3x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 43 overall, wins 2 of 9 usage categories and 0 of 19 specs.
