Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Overall Score
vs
Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L 17mm
Canon
44 Overall Score
Scores
Portrait
Budget
Landscape
Professional
Video Cinema
Street
Macro
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Specifications
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L 17mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | tilt-shift |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 17 mm |
| Elements | — | 18 |
| Groups | — | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 1★ |
| ED Elements | — | 4★ |
| Coating | — | Subwavelength Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/4 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 8★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Canon EF |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 0.82 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | — | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 250 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.14x★ |
Pros & Cons
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L 17mm
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong social proof (72nd percentile)
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average bokeh (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Pricing
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.064score per dollar
vs
Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L 17mm0.018score per dollar
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS offers 3.6x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L 17mm
Scores 44 overall, wins 3 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.
