Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
43 Overall Score
vs
Olympus M.Zuiko V311100BU000 17mm
Olympus
69 Overall Score
Scores
Portrait
Professional
Street
Video Cinema
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Travel
Macro
Specifications
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Olympus M.Zuiko V311100BU000 17mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 17 mm |
| Elements | — | 15 |
| Groups | — | 11 |
| Coating | — | Z Coating Nano |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/1.2 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/1.2 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Micro Four Thirds |
| Format | — | micro-four-thirds |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 0.41 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 62 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | MSC |
| Stabilization | — | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Max Magnification | — | 0.15x★ |
Pros & Cons
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (32nd percentile)
Olympus M.Zuiko V311100BU000 17mm
- Strong aperture (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong bokeh (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong build (78th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.062score per dollar
vs
Olympus M.Zuiko V311100BU000 17mm0.053score per dollar
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS offers 1.2x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Olympus M.Zuiko V311100BU000 17mm
Scores 69 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 18 specs.
