Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
43 Overall Score
vs
Lensbaby Velvet 85mm f/1.8 85mm

Lensbaby Velvet 85mm f/1.8 85mm

Lensbaby
34 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Sigma
56
Lensbaby
35
Portrait
Sigma
55
Lensbaby
33
Video Cinema
Sigma
47
Lensbaby
19
Street
Sigma
45
Lensbaby
23
Professional
Sigma
39
Lensbaby
16
Macro
Sigma
16
Lensbaby
38
Travel
Sigma
38
Lensbaby
20
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
36
Lensbaby
14
Landscape
Sigma
31
Lensbaby
14

Specifications

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OSLensbaby Velvet 85mm f/1.8 85mm
Optics
Type—prime
Focal Length Min16 mm85 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm85 mm
Elements—4
Groups—3
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/16
Min Aperture—f/1.8
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades—12★
Build
Mount—Nikon F
Format—full-frame★
Weight—0.53 kg★
Filter Thread—67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Type—manual focus only
Stabilization—✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance—241 mm★
Max Magnification—1:2★

Pros & Cons

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)
  • Below average build (32nd percentile)

Lensbaby Velvet 85mm f/1.8 85mm

  • Strong macro (79th percentile)
  • Below average optical (0th percentile)0th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Lensbaby Velvet 85mm f/1.8 85mm is $194 cheaper (1.4x less).

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Lensbaby Velvet 85mm f/1.8 85mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 43 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 1 of 17 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Lensbaby Velvet 85mm f/1.8 85mm Better at:

Macro

Also Consider