Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
44 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 16276479 18-55mm

Fujifilm XF 16276479 18-55mm

Fujifilm
71 Overall Score

Scores

Video Cinema
Sigma
47
Fujifilm
76
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
39
Fujifilm
69
Budget
Sigma
56
Fujifilm
67
Professional
Sigma
42
Fujifilm
67
Landscape
Sigma
33
Fujifilm
66
Travel
Sigma
40
Fujifilm
66
Street
Sigma
46
Fujifilm
63
Portrait
Sigma
59
Fujifilm
45
Macro
Sigma
16
Fujifilm
55

Specifications

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OSFujifilm XF 16276479 18-55mm
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min16 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm55 mm
Elements14
Groups10
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements1
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/22
Min Aperture2.8-4
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountFujifilm X
FormatAPS-C
Weight0.31 kg
Filter Thread58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeLinear motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance300 mm
Max Magnification0.15x

Pros & Cons

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Fujifilm XF 16276479 18-55mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong versatility (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)

Pricing

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Fujifilm XF 16276479 18-55mm

Verdict

Winner: Fujifilm XF 16276479 18-55mm

Scores 71 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 20 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Better at:

Portrait

Fujifilm XF 16276479 18-55mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider