Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Overall Score
vs
Nikon AF-S FX TC-14E III Teleconverter 70-200mm
Nikon
68 Overall Score
Scores
Travel
Budget
Street
Macro
Portrait
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Landscape
Specifications
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Nikon AF-S FX TC-14E III Teleconverter 70-200mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 70 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 200 mm |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | — |
| Constant | ✓★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Nikon F |
| Weight | — | 0.19 kg★ |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | AF-S |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 200 mm★ |
Pros & Cons
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Nikon AF-S FX TC-14E III Teleconverter 70-200mm
- Strong build (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong macro (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong versatility (79th percentile)
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
Pricing
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.064score per dollar
vs
Nikon AF-S FX TC-14E III Teleconverter 70-200mm0.131score per dollar
Nikon AF-S FX TC-14E III Teleconverter 70-200mm offers 2.0x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon AF-S FX TC-14E III Teleconverter 70-200mm
Scores 68 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 9 specs.
