Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Overall Score
vs
Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm
Panasonic
64 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Street
Portrait
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Budget
Travel
Landscape
Macro
Specifications
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | — | 12 |
| Groups | — | 9 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 1★ |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/4 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | L-Mount |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 0.50 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | double-magnet linear motor★ |
| Stabilization | — | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 250 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.23x★ |
Pros & Cons
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong bokeh (79th percentile)
- Strong versatility (75th percentile)
- Strong build (72nd percentile)
Pricing
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.064score per dollar
vs
Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm0.048score per dollar
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS offers 1.3x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm
Scores 64 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 20 specs.
