Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
43 Overall Score
vs
Brightin Star 12mm f/2.8 8mm
Brightin Star
49 Overall Score
Scores
Macro
Budget
Portrait
Landscape
Video Cinema
Street
Professional
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Specifications
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Brightin Star 12mm f/2.8 8mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 12 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 12 mm |
| Elements | — | 15 |
| Groups | — | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 2★ |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | — | Multicoated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/16 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 5★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Canon RF |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✗ |
| Weight | — | 0.55 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 34 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | — | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 240 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 2:1★ |
Pros & Cons
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (32nd percentile)
Brightin Star 12mm f/2.8 8mm
- Strong macro (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong optical (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Below average bokeh (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.062score per dollar
vs
Brightin Star 12mm f/2.8 8mm0.223score per dollar
Brightin Star 12mm f/2.8 8mm offers 3.6x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Brightin Star 12mm f/2.8 8mm
Scores 49 overall, wins 3 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.
