Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
43 Overall Score
vs
Zeiss Milvus 21mm f/2.8 ZF.2 21mm
Zeiss
50 Overall Score
Scores
Macro
Budget
Portrait
Professional
Landscape
Video Cinema
Street
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Specifications
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Zeiss Milvus 21mm f/2.8 ZF.2 21mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 21 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 21 mm |
| Elements | — | 16 |
| Groups | — | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 1★ |
| ED Elements | — | 5★ |
| Coating | — | ZEISS T* anti-reflective coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 10★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Canon EF |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 0.73 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 82 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | — | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 220 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:5★ |
Pros & Cons
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (32nd percentile)
Zeiss Milvus 21mm f/2.8 ZF.2 21mm
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong macro (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average bokeh (31st percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.062score per dollar
vs
Zeiss Milvus 21mm f/2.8 ZF.2 21mm0.046score per dollar
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS offers 1.3x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Zeiss Milvus 21mm f/2.8 ZF.2 21mm
Scores 50 overall, wins 3 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.
