Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm Fujinon XF 90mm f/2 R LM WR 90mm
Fujifilm
5 Overall Score
Scores
Portrait
Budget
Video Cinema
Street
Professional
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Macro
Specifications
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Fujifilm Fujinon XF 90mm f/2 R LM WR 90mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 90 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 90 mm |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/90 |
| Constant | ✓★ | — |
Pros & Cons
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Fujifilm Fujinon XF 90mm f/2 R LM WR 90mm
- Below average aperture (1st percentile)1st %ile
- Below average bokeh (1st percentile)1st %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
Pricing
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.064score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm Fujinon XF 90mm f/2 R LM WR 90mm0.004score per dollar
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS offers 16.0x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 44 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 1 of 4 specs.
