Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm

Fujifilm
76 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

92 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

The Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 lens is highly praised for its sharpness, compact size, and excellent low-light performance. Users love its versatility for travel, video, and long exposures, often pairing it with other lenses in the budget trinity. A few note it's not as premium as the S-line or Nikon 14-30mm, but most agree it offers incredible value for the price.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Great value for money
  • Versatile for travel and video
Cons
  • Not as premium as S-line lenses
  • Some prefer wider 14-30mm range
  • Build not as exceptional as premium trinity
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Low light performance 4
👍 Size and weight 5
👍 Versatility 5

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm

92 out of 100 high confidence 30 reviews

The Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR lens is widely praised for its compact size, lightweight build, and excellent image quality. Users highlight its fast and silent autofocus, weather sealing, and versatility for street, portrait, and travel photography. While some note it is not a macro lens and lacks the extreme bokeh of the f/1.4 version, most agree it offers outstanding value as a standard prime.

Pros
  • Compact and lightweight design
  • Fast and silent autofocus
  • Excellent image sharpness
  • Weather sealing
  • Versatile for street, portrait, and travel
Cons
  • Not a macro lens
  • Less bokeh than f/1.4 version
  • No zoom capability
  • Tapered design may look odd
👍 Image quality 10
👍 Build quality 8
👍 Autofocus performance 6
👍 Portability 9
👍 Value for money 5
👍 Weather sealing 4

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Fujifilm
71
Budget
Nikon
85
Fujifilm
69
Street
Nikon
84
Fujifilm
74
Macro
Nikon
84
Fujifilm
65
Portrait
Nikon
84
Fujifilm
54
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Fujifilm
64
Landscape
Nikon
79
Fujifilm
58
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Fujifilm
63
Travel
Nikon
70
Fujifilm
67

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm35 mm
Elements139
Groups116
Aspherical Elements3★2
ED Elements3★2
CoatingMulti-CoatedNano-GI coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZFujifilm X
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.45 kg0.17 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm43 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motorstepping motor
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★350 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:7

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm

  • Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm is $810 cheaper (4.4x less).

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.086score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm0.315score per dollar

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm offers 3.7x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider