Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Artra Lab Lunaelumen-R 50mm f/1.1 50mm

Artra Lab Lunaelumen-R 50mm f/1.1 50mm

Artra Lab
45 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

92 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

The Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 lens is highly praised for its sharpness, compact size, and excellent low-light performance. Users love its versatility for travel, video, and long exposures, often pairing it with other lenses in the budget trinity. A few note it's not as premium as the S-line or Nikon 14-30mm, but most agree it offers incredible value for the price.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Great value for money
  • Versatile for travel and video
Cons
  • Not as premium as S-line lenses
  • Some prefer wider 14-30mm range
  • Build not as exceptional as premium trinity
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Low light performance 4
👍 Size and weight 5
👍 Versatility 5

Artra Lab Lunaelumen-R 50mm f/1.1 50mm

92 out of 100 medium confidence 18 reviews

The Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II lens receives overwhelmingly positive feedback for its exceptional sharpness, fast autofocus, and low-light performance. Users highlight its suitability for both photography and video, with many noting a significant upgrade from previous lenses. A few Q&A entries address concerns about internal movement when the lens is off, which is confirmed as normal stabilizer behavior. Overall, this lens is highly recommended by verified purchasers.

Pros
  • Exceptional sharpness
  • Fast and snappy autofocus
  • Great low-light performance
  • Excellent for video
  • Internal zoom mechanism
Cons
  • Internal movement sound when off (normal stabilizer)
  • Focus-by-wire system (not mechanical)
👍 Image quality 6
👍 Autofocus performance 4
👍 Low light performance 2
👍 Video suitability 2
🤔 Build quality 4
👍 Value for money 1

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Artra Lab
30
Budget
Nikon
85
Artra Lab
33
Street
Nikon
84
Artra Lab
34
Macro
Nikon
84
Artra Lab
47
Portrait
Nikon
84
Artra Lab
35
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Artra Lab
27
Landscape
Nikon
79
Artra Lab
27
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Artra Lab
24
Travel
Nikon
70
Artra Lab
27

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Artra Lab Lunaelumen-R 50mm f/1.1 50mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm50 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm50 mm
Elements138
Groups116
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements3★—
CoatingMulti-CoatedLow-Reflective Multilayer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.1
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades911★
Build
MountNikon ZCanon RF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.45 kg0.40 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★manual focus only
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★350 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26★—

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Artra Lab Lunaelumen-R 50mm f/1.1 50mm

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong macro (67th percentile)
  • Strong build (65th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Artra Lab Lunaelumen-R 50mm f/1.1 50mm is $600 cheaper (2.3x less).

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.086score per dollar
vs
Artra Lab Lunaelumen-R 50mm f/1.1 50mm0.099score per dollar

Artra Lab Lunaelumen-R 50mm f/1.1 50mm offers 1.2x better value for money

Artra Lab Lunaelumen-R 50mm f/1.1 50mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider