Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
Panasonic H-ES35100

Panasonic H-ES35100

Panasonic
60 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
95
Panasonic
69
Portrait
Nikon
89
Panasonic
41
Street
Nikon
86
Panasonic
55
Budget
Nikon
86
Panasonic
57
Macro
Nikon
85
Panasonic
57
Landscape
Nikon
83
Panasonic
73
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Panasonic
58
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Panasonic
70
Travel
Nikon
75
Panasonic
69

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Panasonic H-ES35100
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm100 mm
Elements1318
Groups1113
Aspherical Elements31
ED Elements33
CoatingMulti-CoatedNano Surface Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountNikon ZMicro Four Thirds
Formatfull-framemicro-four-thirds
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.36 kg
Filter Thread67 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorAutofocus
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops2.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm850 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:10

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Panasonic H-ES35100

  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong build (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong versatility (79th percentile)
  • Strong stabilization (76th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.090score per dollar
vs
Panasonic H-ES351000.052score per dollar

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 1.7x better value for money

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider