Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Viltrox PFU RBMH FE 2.0 F1.8 20mm
Viltrox
60 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Macro
Budget
Street
Portrait
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | Viltrox PFU RBMH FE 2.0 F1.8 20mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 17 mm | 20 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 20 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 12 |
| Groups | 11 | 9 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | 1 |
| ED Elements | 3 | 4★ |
| Coating | Multi-Coated | HD NANO Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/1.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/1.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 14★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.45 kg★ | 1.20 kg |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 82 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping Motor★ | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 190 mm★ | 250 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.26★ | — |
Pros & Cons
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
Viltrox PFU RBMH FE 2.0 F1.8 20mm
- Strong bokeh (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong aperture (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong optical (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average build (24th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.086score per dollar
vs
Viltrox PFU RBMH FE 2.0 F1.8 20mm0.150score per dollar
Viltrox PFU RBMH FE 2.0 F1.8 20mm offers 1.7x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.
