Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm GF 50mm f/3.5 R LM WR 50mm

Fujifilm GF 50mm f/3.5 R LM WR 50mm

Fujifilm
42 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Fujifilm
50
Budget
Nikon
85
Fujifilm
41
Street
Nikon
84
Fujifilm
44
Macro
Nikon
84
Fujifilm
45
Portrait
Nikon
84
Fujifilm
26
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Fujifilm
43
Landscape
Nikon
79
Fujifilm
42
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Fujifilm
51
Travel
Nikon
70
Fujifilm
42

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Fujifilm GF 50mm f/3.5 R LM WR 50mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm50 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm50 mm
Elements139
Groups116
Aspherical Elements3★1
ED Elements3★—
CoatingMulti-Coatedfluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/32
Min Aperturef/2.8f/3.5
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZFujifilm G
Formatfull-frame★medium-format
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.45 kg0.34 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm62 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorLinear motor★
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★550 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261x

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Fujifilm GF 50mm f/3.5 R LM WR 50mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong build (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (7th percentile)7th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.087score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm GF 50mm f/3.5 R LM WR 50mm0.036score per dollar

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 2.4x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider