Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM

Sigma Contemporary 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM

Sigma
58 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Sigma
45
Budget
Nikon
85
Sigma
64
Street
Nikon
84
Sigma
47
Macro
Nikon
84
Sigma
58
Portrait
Nikon
84
Sigma
58
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Sigma
56
Landscape
Nikon
79
Sigma
39
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Sigma
43
Travel
Nikon
70
Sigma
44

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Sigma Contemporary 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto
Focal Length Min17 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm300 mm
Elements13—
Groups11—
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements3★—
CoatingMulti-Coated—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/3.5
Min Aperturef/2.8—
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades9★—
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF
Formatfull-frame★—
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.45 kg★0.58 kg
Filter Thread67 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★HSM
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★300 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26★—

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Sigma Contemporary 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM

  • Strong versatility (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average build (19th percentile)19th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile

Pricing

Sigma Contemporary 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider