Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon
89 Overall Score
vs
Canon L EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II USM

Canon L EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II USM

Canon
71 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

92 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

The Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 lens is highly praised for its sharpness, compact size, and excellent low-light performance. Users love its versatility for travel, video, and long exposures, often pairing it with other lenses in the budget trinity. A few note it's not as premium as the S-line or Nikon 14-30mm, but most agree it offers incredible value for the price.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Great value for money
  • Versatile for travel and video
Cons
  • Not as premium as S-line lenses
  • Some prefer wider 14-30mm range
  • Build not as exceptional as premium trinity
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Low light performance 4
👍 Size and weight 5
👍 Versatility 5

Canon L EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II USM

88 out of 100 high confidence 186 reviews

The Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II USM is widely praised for its exceptional sharpness, lightweight design, and effective image stabilization. Users consistently highlight the lens's superb image quality, fast autofocus, and excellent value compared to the heavier f/2.8 version. A few criticisms include the lack of an included tripod collar and some reports of IS noise or autofocus issues in low light. Overall, it is considered a top-tier telephoto zoom for enthusiasts and professionals who prioritize portability.

Pros
  • Exceptional sharpness across zoom range
  • Lightweight and portable design
  • Effective 5-stop image stabilization
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
  • Excellent image quality and color
Cons
  • Tripod collar not included
  • IS noise in some units
  • Autofocus issues in low light
  • No teleconverter compatibility
  • High price point
👍 Image quality 35
👍 Sharpness 28
👍 Weight and portability 22
👍 Image stabilization 18
👍 Autofocus performance 15
👍 Value for money 12

Scores

Portrait
Nikon
89
Canon
43
Professional
Nikon
89
Canon
68
Macro
Nikon
84
Canon
57
Budget
Nikon
84
Canon
74
Street
Nikon
83
Canon
55
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Canon
75
Travel
Nikon
73
Canon
79
Landscape
Nikon
78
Canon
74
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
72
Canon
77

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mmCanon L EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II USM
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm70 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm200 mm
Elements1316
Groups1115
Aspherical Elements3★0
ED Elements3★2
CoatingMulti-CoatedSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/32
Min Aperturef/2.8f/4
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.45 kg★0.78 kg
Filter Thread67 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorUSM★
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★600 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26★0.28x

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile

Canon L EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II USM

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong af (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong optical (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (8th percentile)8th %ile

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Scores 89 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo Cinema

Canon L EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II USM Better at:

TravelWildlife Sports

Also Consider