Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
TTArtisan 21mm f/1.5 21mm

TTArtisan 21mm f/1.5 21mm

TTArtisan
33 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
TTArtisan
31
Macro
Nikon
88
TTArtisan
42
Budget
Nikon
85
TTArtisan
28
Street
Nikon
84
TTArtisan
34
Portrait
Nikon
84
TTArtisan
35
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
TTArtisan
28
Landscape
Nikon
79
TTArtisan
28
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
TTArtisan
23
Travel
Nikon
70
TTArtisan
25

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8TTArtisan 21mm f/1.5 21mm
Optics
Typezoomwide-angle
Focal Length Min17 mm21 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm21 mm
Elements1313
Groups1111
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements3★—
CoatingMulti-Coated—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.5
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades910★
Build
MountNikon ZLeica M
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.45 kg0.41 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★manual focus only
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★700 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26★—

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

TTArtisan 21mm f/1.5 21mm

  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

TTArtisan 21mm f/1.5 21mm is $805 cheaper (4.3x less).

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.086score per dollar
vs
TTArtisan 21mm f/1.5 21mm0.136score per dollar

TTArtisan 21mm f/1.5 21mm offers 1.6x better value for money

TTArtisan 21mm f/1.5 21mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider