Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Canon CAN3580M3EF-OB 35-80mm

Canon CAN3580M3EF-OB 35-80mm

Canon
56 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Canon
40
Macro
Nikon
88
Canon
60
Budget
Nikon
85
Canon
55
Street
Nikon
84
Canon
57
Portrait
Nikon
84
Canon
51
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Canon
42
Landscape
Nikon
79
Canon
35
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Canon
40
Travel
Nikon
70
Canon
52

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Canon CAN3580M3EF-OB 35-80mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm80 mm
Elements13—
Groups11—
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements3★—
CoatingMulti-Coated—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/4
Min Aperturef/2.84.0-5.6
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades9★—
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF
Formatfull-frame★—
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.45 kg0.20 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★Autofocus
Stabilization✗—
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm80 mm★
Max Magnification1:5.26★—

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Canon CAN3580M3EF-OB 35-80mm

  • Strong macro (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong build (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong versatility (76th percentile)
  • Strong aperture (66th percentile)
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile

Pricing

Canon CAN3580M3EF-OB 35-80mm is $942 cheaper (9.7x less).

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.086score per dollar
vs
Canon CAN3580M3EF-OB 35-80mm0.521score per dollar

Canon CAN3580M3EF-OB 35-80mm offers 6.1x better value for money

Canon CAN3580M3EF-OB 35-80mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider