Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Cine 28-105mm T3 FF Cine 105mm

Sigma Cine 28-105mm T3 FF Cine 105mm

Sigma
37 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Sigma
37
Macro
Nikon
88
Sigma
49
Budget
Nikon
85
Sigma
40
Street
Nikon
84
Sigma
33
Portrait
Nikon
84
Sigma
32
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Sigma
39
Landscape
Nikon
79
Sigma
37
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Sigma
31
Travel
Nikon
70
Sigma
32

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Sigma Cine 28-105mm T3 FF Cine 105mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm105 mm
Elements1318
Groups1113
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements3★—
CoatingMulti-Coated—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8T22
Min Aperturef/2.8T3
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades912★
Build
MountNikon ZL-Mount
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.45 kg★1.30 kg
Filter Thread67 mm82 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★Autofocus
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★400 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:3.1

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Sigma Cine 28-105mm T3 FF Cine 105mm

  • Strong versatility (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong optical (73rd percentile)
  • Below average build (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (34th percentile)

Pricing

Sigma Cine 28-105mm T3 FF Cine 105mm

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider