Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III 75-300mm
Canon
24 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Macro
Budget
Street
Portrait
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III 75-300mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | telephoto-zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 17 mm | 75 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 300 mm |
| Elements | 13 | — |
| Groups | 11 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | — |
| ED Elements | 3★ | — |
| Coating | Multi-Coated | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/5.6 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | Canon EF |
| Format | full-frame★ | — |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.45 kg★ | 2.27 kg |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping Motor★ | — |
| Stabilization | ✗ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 190 mm★ | — |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.26★ | — |
Pros & Cons
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III 75-300mm
- Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong aperture (66th percentile)
- Below average build (1st percentile)1st %ile
- Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
Pricing
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.086score per dollar
vs
Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III 75-300mm0.120score per dollar
Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III 75-300mm offers 1.4x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.
