Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm Fujinon GF 120mm f/4 R LM OIS WR Macro 120mm

Fujifilm Fujinon GF 120mm f/4 R LM OIS WR Macro 120mm

Fujifilm
17 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

92 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

The Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 lens is highly praised for its sharpness, compact size, and excellent low-light performance. Users love its versatility for travel, video, and long exposures, often pairing it with other lenses in the budget trinity. A few note it's not as premium as the S-line or Nikon 14-30mm, but most agree it offers incredible value for the price.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Great value for money
  • Versatile for travel and video
Cons
  • Not as premium as S-line lenses
  • Some prefer wider 14-30mm range
  • Build not as exceptional as premium trinity
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Low light performance 4
👍 Size and weight 5
👍 Versatility 5

Fujifilm Fujinon GF 120mm f/4 R LM OIS WR Macro 120mm

85 out of 100 low confidence 6 reviews

The Fuji GF 120mm f4 macro lens receives overwhelmingly positive feedback from users who praise its exceptional sharpness and versatility for both macro and portrait photography. Reviewers highlight the lens's tack-sharp performance even wide open, beautiful bokeh, and effective image stabilization, though they note its weight and recommend using a tripod for extended shoots. A Q&A confirms that while a dedicated teleconverter is planned by Fujifilm, it is not yet available for this lens system.

Pros
  • tack sharp even wide open
  • excellent bokeh for portraits
  • effective image stabilization
  • versatile for macro and portrait
  • great ergonomics
Cons
  • heavy lens
  • tripod recommended for long shoots
  • teleconverter not yet available
👍 Image quality 3
👍 Sharpness 2
👍 Versatility 2
👎 Weight 3
👎 Tripod necessity 2
👎 Teleconverter availability 1

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Fujifilm
23
Budget
Nikon
85
Fujifilm
14
Street
Nikon
84
Fujifilm
15
Macro
Nikon
84
Fujifilm
14
Portrait
Nikon
84
Fujifilm
8
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Fujifilm
23
Landscape
Nikon
79
Fujifilm
21
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Fujifilm
29
Travel
Nikon
70
Fujifilm
19

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Fujifilm Fujinon GF 120mm f/4 R LM OIS WR Macro 120mm
Optics
Typezoommacro
Focal Length Min17 mm120 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm120 mm
Elements13—
Groups11—
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements3★—
CoatingMulti-Coated—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/120
Min Aperturef/2.8f/4
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades9★—
Build
MountNikon ZG
Formatfull-frame★medium-format
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.45 kg★0.98 kg
Filter Thread67 mm72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★LM
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★—
Max Magnification1:5.26★0.5x

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Fujifilm Fujinon GF 120mm f/4 R LM OIS WR Macro 120mm

  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average aperture (1st percentile)1st %ile
  • Below average bokeh (1st percentile)1st %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 is $2,050 cheaper (3.0x less).

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.086score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm Fujinon GF 120mm f/4 R LM OIS WR Macro 120mm0.005score per dollar

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 17.2x better value for money

Fujifilm Fujinon GF 120mm f/4 R LM OIS WR Macro 120mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider