Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
BLAZAR LENS Beetle 65mm T3.2 1.33x Full-Frame Anamorphic 65mm
BLAZAR LENS
44 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Macro
Budget
Street
Portrait
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | BLAZAR LENS Beetle 65mm T3.2 1.33x Full-Frame Anamorphic 65mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | — |
| Focal Length Min | 17 mm | 65 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 65 mm |
| Elements | 13 | — |
| Groups | 11 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | — |
| ED Elements | 3★ | — |
| Coating | Multi-Coated | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | — |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | — |
| Constant | ✓★ | — |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | L-Mount |
| Format | full-frame | Full-Frame (36 x 24 mm Sensor) |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.45 kg | 0.29 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 55 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping Motor★ | — |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 190 mm★ | 460 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.26★ | — |
Pros & Cons
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
BLAZAR LENS Beetle 65mm T3.2 1.33x Full-Frame Anamorphic 65mm
- Strong build (76th percentile)
- Strong aperture (66th percentile)
- Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.086score per dollar
vs
BLAZAR LENS Beetle 65mm T3.2 1.33x Full-Frame Anamorphic 65mm0.074score per dollar
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 1.2x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.
