Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD 28-300mm

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD 28-300mm

Tamron
64 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Tamron
66
Budget
Nikon
85
Tamron
60
Street
Nikon
84
Tamron
58
Macro
Nikon
84
Tamron
79
Portrait
Nikon
84
Tamron
56
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Tamron
58
Landscape
Nikon
79
Tamron
73
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Tamron
64
Travel
Nikon
70
Tamron
63

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD 28-300mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm300 mm
Elements1320
Groups1113
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements3★2
CoatingMulti-CoatedBBAR-G2 Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/7.1
Min Aperturef/2.8f/4
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades9★—
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.45 kg★0.61 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★VXD
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm190 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:2.8

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD 28-300mm

  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

Pricing

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD 28-300mm is $351 cheaper (1.5x less).

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 VXD 28-300mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider