Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
78 Overall Score
vs
Sigma MC-11 89E965

Sigma MC-11 89E965

Sigma
45 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

82 out of 100 high confidence 34 reviews

The Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 is widely praised for its sharpness, fast and quiet autofocus, and compact, lightweight design, making it a favorite for event, wedding, real estate, and travel photography. Users appreciate the constant f/2.8 aperture for low light and the internal zoom that keeps gimbals balanced. A few negative reviews mention resolution issues, excessive contrast, or that it's a rebranded Tamron, but the overall sentiment is very positive, with many calling it a great value.

Pros
  • Sharp and crisp images
  • Fast and quiet autofocus
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Constant f/2.8 aperture
  • Internal zoom for gimbal balance
Cons
  • Resolution issues in some copies
  • Excessive contrast in images
  • Rebranded Tamron design
  • Not as sharp as S-line lenses
  • Made in China
👍 Image quality 18
👍 Autofocus performance 8
👍 Build quality 10
👍 Value for money 7
👍 Size and weight 9
👍 Gimbal compatibility 5

Sigma MC-11 89E965

No customer feedback yet

Scores

Portrait
Nikon
88
Sigma
57
Professional
Nikon
87
Sigma
36
Street
Nikon
84
Sigma
44
Video Cinema
Nikon
80
Sigma
46
Landscape
Nikon
79
Sigma
26
Budget
Nikon
78
Sigma
46
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
72
Sigma
36
Travel
Nikon
71
Sigma
27
Macro
Nikon
64
Sigma
24

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Sigma MC-11 89E965
Optics
Typezoom—
Focal Length Min17 mm—
Focal Length Max28 mm—
Elements13—
Groups11—
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements3★—
Coatingantifouling coating—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8—
Min Aperturef/2.8—
Constant✓★—
Diaphragm Blades9★—
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF a Sony E (EOS-SE)
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.45 kg★—
Filter Thread67 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★—
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★—
Max Magnification0.19x★—

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong bokeh (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong aperture (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

Sigma MC-11 89E965

  • Strong stabilization (79th percentile)
  • Strong aperture (71st percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (70th percentile)
  • Below average macro (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average optical (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average build (29th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Sigma MC-11 89E965 is $781 cheaper (3.9x less).

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.074score per dollar
vs
Sigma MC-11 89E9650.167score per dollar

Sigma MC-11 89E965 offers 2.3x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 78 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider