Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
78 Overall Score
vs
Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm

Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm

Zeiss
71 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

82 out of 100 high confidence 34 reviews

The Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 is widely praised for its sharpness, fast and quiet autofocus, and compact, lightweight design, making it a favorite for event, wedding, real estate, and travel photography. Users appreciate the constant f/2.8 aperture for low light and the internal zoom that keeps gimbals balanced. A few negative reviews mention resolution issues, excessive contrast, or that it's a rebranded Tamron, but the overall sentiment is very positive, with many calling it a great value.

Pros
  • Sharp and crisp images
  • Fast and quiet autofocus
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Constant f/2.8 aperture
  • Internal zoom for gimbal balance
Cons
  • Resolution issues in some copies
  • Excessive contrast in images
  • Rebranded Tamron design
  • Not as sharp as S-line lenses
  • Made in China
👍 Image quality 18
👍 Autofocus performance 8
👍 Build quality 10
👍 Value for money 7
👍 Size and weight 9
👍 Gimbal compatibility 5

Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm

85 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

The Zeiss Batis lenses receive overwhelmingly positive feedback for their exceptional image quality, beautiful bokeh, and solid build. Users praise the sharpness, color rendering, and fast autofocus, though one reviewer noted a defective unit with packaging issues. Overall, these lenses are highly recommended for portrait and outdoor photography, with minor caveats about weight and price.

Pros
  • Exceptional image sharpness
  • Beautiful bokeh rendering
  • Fast and quiet autofocus
  • Solid build quality
  • Excellent color reproduction
Cons
  • High price point
  • Heavy weight
  • Requires distance for portraits
  • Defective unit reported
  • Poor packaging in some cases
👍 Image quality 7
👍 Bokeh 5
👍 Autofocus 5
👍 Build quality 6
🤔 Price 4
👎 Weight 3

Scores

Portrait
Nikon
88
Zeiss
82
Professional
Nikon
87
Zeiss
76
Street
Nikon
83
Zeiss
68
Video Cinema
Nikon
80
Zeiss
76
Landscape
Nikon
79
Zeiss
59
Budget
Nikon
78
Zeiss
66
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
72
Zeiss
62
Travel
Nikon
71
Zeiss
53
Macro
Nikon
64
Zeiss
48

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto
Focal Length Min17 mm135 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm135 mm
Elements1314
Groups1111
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements3★—
Coatingantifouling coatingZEISS T* coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades9★—
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.45 kg★0.61 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★Autofocus
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★—
Max Magnification0.19x★—

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong bokeh (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong aperture (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm

  • Strong aperture (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (79th percentile)
  • Below average macro (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 is $579 cheaper (1.6x less).

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.074score per dollar
vs
Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm0.043score per dollar

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 1.7x better value for money

Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 78 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider