Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 35mm f/2 DG 35mm

Sigma Contemporary 35mm f/2 DG 35mm

Sigma
68 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
95
Sigma
80
Portrait
Nikon
89
Sigma
82
Street
Nikon
86
Sigma
72
Budget
Nikon
86
Sigma
59
Macro
Nikon
85
Sigma
70
Landscape
Nikon
83
Sigma
61
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Sigma
69
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Sigma
59
Travel
Nikon
75
Sigma
52

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Sigma Contemporary 35mm f/2 DG 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm35 mm
Elements1310
Groups119
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements31
CoatingMulti-CoatedSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZL-Mount
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.33 kg
Filter Thread67 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm270 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:5.56

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Sigma Contemporary 35mm f/2 DG 35mm

  • Strong bokeh (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong aperture (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong build (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong macro (76th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Sigma Contemporary 35mm f/2 DG 35mm is $331 cheaper (1.5x less).

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider