Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II

Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II

Canon
73 Overall Score
vs
Pentax Limited Series 23010 40mm

Pentax Limited Series 23010 40mm

Pentax
73 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II

65 out of 100 high confidence 129 reviews

This kit lens is a decent entry-level option for beginners learning DSLR photography, offering good image quality and image stabilization at a low price. However, many users report that the autofocus is slow and unreliable in low light, and the build quality feels cheap and prone to breaking after several months. While it serves well as a starter lens, most reviewers recommend upgrading to a faster or better-built lens as skills improve.

Pros
  • Good image quality for the price
  • Effective image stabilization
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Versatile focal range for everyday use
  • Great starter lens for beginners
Cons
  • Slow and unreliable autofocus in low light
  • Cheap plastic build quality
  • Autofocus motor noise in video
  • Soft image quality at telephoto end
  • Limited maximum aperture (f/5.6 at 55mm)
👍 Image quality 35
👎 Autofocus performance 28
👎 Build quality 20
👍 Image stabilization 15
👍 Value for money 18
👎 Low light performance 12

Pentax Limited Series 23010 40mm

82 out of 100 medium confidence 24 reviews

The Pentax HD DA 20-40mm f/2.8-4 ED Limited DC WR lens is highly praised for its superb build quality, sharpness, and beautiful color rendition. Users love it as a versatile walk-around lens for street photography and landscapes, especially on APS-C bodies like the K-3. The main drawbacks are its variable aperture and a price that many feel is too high for the performance gain over kit lenses.

Pros
  • Superb build quality
  • Excellent sharpness
  • Beautiful color rendition
  • Weather resistant
  • Versatile focal range for street and landscape
Cons
  • Variable aperture (f/2.8-4)
  • High price for performance gain
  • Limited zoom range
  • Not as wide as some kit lenses
👍 Build quality 8
👍 Sharpness 7
👍 Color rendition 5
👎 Value for money 4
👍 Weather resistance 3
👎 Variable aperture 3

Scores

Budget
Canon
87
Pentax
78
Street
Canon
83
Pentax
77
Video Cinema
Canon
81
Pentax
61
Travel
Canon
80
Pentax
77
Landscape
Canon
78
Pentax
65
Portrait
Canon
75
Pentax
73
Macro
Canon
74
Pentax
68
Professional
Canon
65
Pentax
65
Wildlife Sports
Canon
64
Pentax
59

Specifications

Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS IIPentax Limited Series 23010 40mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min18 mm20 mm
Focal Length Max55 mm40 mm
Elements119
Groups98
Aspherical Elements11
ED Elements11
CoatingSuper Spectra coatingHD coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/4
Min Aperture3.5-5.62.8-4
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades69★
Build
MountCanon EF-SPentax K
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✗✓★
Weight0.20 kg★0.28 kg
Filter Thread58 mm55 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeMicro MotorDC
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm★280 mm
Max Magnification0.34x1:5★

Pros & Cons

Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II

  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (8th percentile)8th %ile

Pentax Limited Series 23010 40mm

  • Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong macro (73rd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (35th percentile)

Pricing

Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II is $401 cheaper (4.5x less).

Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II0.632score per dollar
vs
Pentax Limited Series 23010 40mm0.140score per dollar

Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II offers 4.5x better value for money

Verdict

═ Tie

Both products are closely matched - Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II wins 4 specs while Pentax Limited Series 23010 40mm wins 3.

Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider