Altura Photo UM2267
Altura Photo
74 Overall Score
vs
Insta360 X5 CINSBAHB 6mm
Insta360
36 Overall Score
Scores
Macro
Street
Budget
Portrait
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Travel
Landscape
Specifications
| Altura Photo UM2267 | Insta360 X5 CINSBAHB 6mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | wide-angle | fisheye |
| Focal Length Min | — | 6 mm |
| Focal Length Max | — | 6 mm |
| Coating | multicoated glass optics | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | — | f/2 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/2 |
| Constant | — | ✓★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Screw-on lens fits camera lenses with a 49mm front filter thread | Insta360 X5 |
| Weight | 0.30 kg★ | — |
| Filter Thread | 49 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | STM★ | — |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 45 mm★ | — |
Pros & Cons
Altura Photo UM2267
- Strong macro (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong build (75th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Insta360 X5 CINSBAHB 6mm
- Strong aperture (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average build (32nd percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
Altura Photo UM22672.256score per dollar
vs
Insta360 X5 CINSBAHB 6mm1.184score per dollar
Altura Photo UM2267 offers 1.9x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Altura Photo UM2267
Scores 74 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 13 specs.
