Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm

Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm

Viltrox
86 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Art 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM

Sigma Art 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM

Sigma
79 Overall Score

Scores

Portrait
Viltrox
100
Sigma
85
Video Cinema
Viltrox
94
Sigma
83
Professional
Viltrox
88
Sigma
70
Budget
Viltrox
83
Sigma
82
Street
Viltrox
82
Sigma
72
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
71
Sigma
51
Landscape
Viltrox
69
Sigma
57
Macro
Viltrox
66
Sigma
66
Travel
Viltrox
55
Sigma
49

Specifications

Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mmSigma Art 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min27 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max27 mm35 mm
Elements1517
Groups1112
Aspherical Elements14★
ED Elements25★
CoatingHD Nano multilayer coating with water-resistant and antifouling coatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/1.2f/1.8
Min Aperturef/1.2f/1.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades11★9
Build
MountSony ENikon F
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✓★✗
Weight0.56 kg★0.81 kg
Filter Thread67 mm72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★HSM
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm280 mm
Max Magnification0.15x0.23x★

Pros & Cons

Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm

  • Strong aperture (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sigma Art 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM

  • Strong optical (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong aperture (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average build (23rd percentile)

Pricing

Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm is $337 cheaper (1.7x less).

Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm0.187score per dollar
vs
Sigma Art 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM0.099score per dollar

Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm offers 1.9x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm

Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 27mm Better at:

StreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider