Zeiss Milvus 135mm f/2 ZE 135mm
Zeiss
32 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
98 Overall Score
Scores
Macro
Landscape
Budget
Travel
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Portrait
Professional
Street
Specifications
| Zeiss Milvus 135mm f/2 ZE 135mm | Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 135 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 135 mm | 300 mm |
| Elements | 11 | 20 |
| Groups | 8 | 14 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 4★ |
| ED Elements | — | 5★ |
| Coating | — | water- and oil-repellent coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/22 | 3.5-6.7 |
| Constant | — | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF | Sony E |
| Format | Full-Frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 1.12 kg | 0.61 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | HLA |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 6 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 800 mm | 170 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:4 | 1:2 |
Pros & Cons
Zeiss Milvus 135mm f/2 ZE 135mm
- Strong aperture (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average user sentiment (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average build (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile
Pricing
Zeiss Milvus 135mm f/2 ZE 135mm0.014score per dollar
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.141score per dollar
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS offers 10.1x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.
